What happens to Cassandra's water rights when she sells her house on the river?

When Cassandra sells her house on the river, she also transfers the associated rights to use the water from the river to the buyer. In Arizona, water rights are typically considered appurtenant to the land. This means that when a property that includes access to a water source is sold, the rights to utilize that water source generally pass along with the property, unless otherwise stipulated in the sale agreement.

This transfer ensures that the buyer can continue to benefit from the water resources that were available to the property prior to the sale. Thus, unless Cassandra specifically retains her water rights in the sale document, the right to use the river is included in the property transaction, solidifying the buyer’s claim to those rights.

Options suggesting that Cassandra retains all rights or that the buyer has no claim are inconsistent with this principle of appurtenancy in property law. Moreover, while it’s possible for people to sell water rights separately in some contexts, the situation presented implies that the rights are associated with the land being sold, reinforcing the idea that the buyer acquires these rights automatically with property ownership.